Skip to content


To learn or develop?

Recently I had opportunity to participate in the Bay Area Organizational Development Network (BAodn) annual meeting in San Francisco. About halfway through the meeting I had the following thoughts:

  • Why the heck am in a meeting with a bunch of OD folks when I think of myself as an Instructional Designer?
  • What’s is organizational development? How is it different from organizational learning?
  • What the difference between development and learning?
Flash Mob Dance - Informal group learning

Flash Mob Dance - Informal Group Learning?

I realized that  really liked the folks at this meeting — it was the first meeting I’ve been to in the Bay Area where I felt “Ah, I’ve found my people.” Since I want to keep going, I had to figure out a WHY I was there — what was the connection?

Development vs. Learning

Why not start with the basics?

  • Development – stages that one goes through in one’s life or one’s life or one’s career, often thought of as change in roles (becoming a mother or becoming a manager). These stages in development can be biological (aging); psychological (maturing, identity); or sociocultural (change in roles, life or career events/problems/trajectory). In addition, there are variables such as race, gender, and sexual orientation and the impact and influence on that person’s development.
  • Learning – knowledge, skills and attitudes required to master a subject, attain performance, or understand a domain, or innovate. Learning, like development, is about change and growth. Or sometimes just about “running to stand still” — keeping up with change to maintain one’s position. There is formal and informal learning; online, face-to-face, and blended; there is the technology of learning from CMS/LMS/Performance Management systems to Webinars to games and virtual worlds. Learning is a part of development. Learning integrated with development leads to “teachable moments” — learning appropriate to developmental stages. There’s much much more but I’ll stop here.

Organizational development vs. learning

Continuing from the explanation above, then organizational development is about the stages of an organization. It has an action orientation — it’s about evaluating and creating an intervention. Examples below:

  • What an organization need when moving from start-up to mature organization
  • Using diagnostic tools to understand what “life event” an organization is facing and creating an intervention, such as:
    • Using organizational 360 or SLCQ (Strategy Leadership Culture Questionnaire)
    • Using something like the Periodic Table of Strategy (Mercer-Delta) to determine the challenge and potential strategic moves for an organization
    • Gap  of where an organization is, where they want to go, and what it will take to get there.
    • SWOT analysis – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
  • Based on Senge’s five disciplines to create the learning organization:
    • personal mastery
    • mental models
    • shared visions
    • team learning
    • systems thinking
  • Using coaching, mentoring, other tools to improve organizational performance

Organizational Learning

Quite simply, organizational learning is the collection of stuff involved in individual and collective learning inside an organization. It is also about the analysis and support of learning processes, formal and informal.

  • Courses and curriculum
  • Informal learning – social media, water-cooler learning, blogs, wikis, enabling conversations, mentoring, etc.
  • Technology that support the above
  • Design that supports the above
  • Understanding of the cognitive and social processes that support learning
  • Understanding the organizational processes that support or impeded learning
  • Design of learning that supports organizational strategy
  • Senge’s five disciplines

It’s in the last four that we cross-over into the realm of organizational development. There is clearly a link between the two — when things aren’t working on an organizational level, often we often turn to learning and development. However, much less often, do we turn to learning and development when things ARE working — or when we want to make things better when they are already good.

Why an Instructional Designer meets with OD folks

Instructional design (ID) is too narrowly focused on creating learning — instead of being more broadly focused on creating learning specific to organizational strategy — specific enough to measure impact. Because of the narrow focus of ID, I’m am pulled to people and groups asking bigger questions, with an organizational focus.

I love thinking about how people learn, but I also need (for my sanity) to think about how organizations learn, and how individual learning is relevant in this bigger picture.

That’s why I joined BAodn.


p.s. I’m a little behind on my Learning About Wine instructional design. Will get back to it soon!

References for this Learning vs. Development article:

Posted in business, instructional design, OD.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .


Learning Wine – where to begin?

Red and White wine glassesLearning about wine always seemed a little overwhelming to me. I was never sure where to begin — and then you had to get past all that snooty wine talk, which to a novice is a little intimidating.

Perfect for a learning experience! Here’s a domain where you have to know a lot of terms, be able to distinguish between the terms, and then be able to establish a point-of-view of your wine preferences — as opposed to Robert Parker’s wine preferences, or the Wine Spectator’s wine preferences. Yes, and then there’s understanding all these wine point guides.

So let’s just reiterate these key points:

  • Audience – novice wine drinkers who want to learn more about wine, who are intimidated by the language of wine, and who may position themselves as anti-wine or anti-elitist.
  • Outcomes – establish a point-of-view on what wine one likes to drink – wine preferences; be able to “defend” or speak-to that POV.
  • Learning Tasks – some initial thoughts
    • Distinguish red from white (hey! an easy win, no?)
    • Understand fortified wines are, blends vs. single varietals, old world vs. new
    • Distinguish main varietals – Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, Pinot Grigo, Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Syrah, Merlot, common blends (Bordeaux)
    • Know some of the lesser varietals/blends
    • Pair wine with foods – the basics, more complex
    • Going into a wine store and buying wine for:
      • a drinking party
      • a special occasion
      • for your cellar – collecting wines

Distinguishing is both a visual task (red/white, etc.), cognitive task – knowing the terms, and being able to taste the difference. It’s also about being able to understand the mental models in the wine world (such as old world vs. new world). It may also be possible to define some cognitive strategies: systematic approaches to problem solving in this domain or rules of thumb (especially when it comes to wine pairings). Developing a cognitive strategy for oneself and a POV is about creating an approach to answering the question – “What wine do I want to drink?” To this end, a tool such as a wine journal, is a good start.

Methods

  • This could be done as an extremely long PowerPoint presentation (save me now…put me out of my misery!) – or maybe just some part of it….
  • It could be an in-person learning experience — in fact, some of it *has* to be!!! Virtual wine is just no fun. Self-directed, in-person learning experience — include a guide to wine bars, wine tasting, or do-it-yourself tryouts
  • It could be a game – stay with me. If you have a group of people who are resistant to wine, one could create a game (part-task practice) on suggesting wine to a particular type of wine drinker. The more “right” suggestions you make, the more the will drink (although not P.C., it would be fun to see how much you could get people to drink…. creating drunks…. hmmm…sub-goal)

So these are just some initial thoughts on creating a learning experience about wine. I have to thank my friend Paul for all his years of encouragement on experimenting with wine. More next week.

p.s. If you have thoughts or experiences on who you learned about wine, please share!

Posted in games, instructional design.

Tagged with , , .


The twatter about twitter

Recently a friend called me up and said “What’s so special about twitter? Can you explain this to me?” So off we went to a local cafe and talked about twitter (or I should say we twalked about twittter?.) I think I helped her, but I’m not really sure. I was a little tired, a little distracted — so I did what any learning person would do — I created an outline on how I might teach about twitter, and then created a slide deck as a quick learning tool.  (Now I could have also done this in Prezi….hmm…maybe next time.)

The main questions I’m trying to answer is “What is twitter?” and “Why should I bother?” My interest in this introduction is not to get into branding, or social media marketing, or any of that. It’s really a reflection on why I got interested in twitter, and why you might find it interesting too. It was also to dispel the myth that twitter is just about gossip — because it’s not (though that is a large part of what goes on I must say.)

This also gave me to the opportunity to add to my portfolio and was a warm up exercise to get me motivated to do that learning thing I want to do about wine, which, you know, I’m getting to.

For you viewing pleasure, a slidecast. No complex builds because Slideshare doesn’t allow for that.

Posted in instructional design, social media, tools.

Tagged with , , .